Frequency of use of horse training “equipment” spurs Canadian research

© Kerry Evans

Canadian researchers looking at welfare repercussions have explored the frequency of use of training equipment with horses – such as whips, spurs and head-control equipment including martingale and draw reins.Researchers at the University of Guelph were interested in how often riders and trainers use training equipment, and how often horse enthusiasts not actively involved with horses think that the equipment is used. Interestingly, they found that the non-active horse enthusiasts thought that spurs and head-control equipment were used more often than what was actually reported by riders and trainers. These results were recently published in the Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science.

University of Guelph researcher Katrina Merkies with Goose.
University of Guelph researcher Katrina Merkies with Goose.

Many believe training equipment, such as spurs, whips and martingales, can help riders communicate cues to horses when used properly. When the equipment is used improperly, it can cause confusion and stress, adversely affecting the horse’s welfare. Despite the increased interest in horse welfare, lead researcher Dr Katrina Merkies notes that there has been no Canadian research on how often training equipment is actually used, or how often it was thought to be used, until now.

The researchers also asked study participants what the training equipment was used for, such as augmenting rider or trainer cues or lunging. Interestingly, non-active horse enthusiasts also believed that certain training equipment was used for positive punishment purposes more often than was actually reported by the riders and trainers.

“The use of a training device such as spurs or whips in and of itself is not a bad thing. In the hands of a skilled and knowledgeable trainer, the use of a training device may actually result in finer, lighter aids for the horse and better communication with the rider,” Merkies said.

The research team suggests that educational efforts should be made to ensure that the broader community recognises this. She points to the International Society for Equitation Science’s position statement on aversive stimuli in horse training as an educational resource for understanding the proper use of training equipment.

Merkies sees several potential directions for this research. “It would be interesting to look at how professional trainers interpret the application of various training aids. Do they understand learning theory? I’d also like to look at rider/trainer recognition of conflict behaviour in ridden/driven horses and determine what the common belief is about why horses are exhibiting these behaviours.

“Further investigation may also look at the force applied by various training equipment – it was often commented that a piece of equipment was used ‘lightly’, but how light is light?”

Preliminary study on current perceptions and usage of training equipment by horse enthusiasts in Canada. Merkies K, Nakonechny L, DuBois C, Derisoud E. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science. 2018 Apr-Jun;21(2):141-152. doi: 10.1080/10888705.2017.1392301

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *