It ranks as one of the world’s greatest and earliest digital revolutions – how the horse successfully reduced its multi-toed footprint over millions of years of evolution.
Though modern horses now have a single toe on each foot, their earliest ancestors had three on their front legs and four on the back.
Scientists are now shedding new light on what drove those changes, and in a new study show that the dual pressures of increasing body weight and shrinking side toes prompted early horses’ middle toes to become dramatically stronger and better able to resist forces.
If you want to understand the history of modern horses, start with their feet.
With just one toe per foot, modern horses are somewhat unusual in the animal kingdom, but it wasn’t always that way. Their earliest ancestors were typically about the size of a small dog, with a full set of 14 toes.
In a just-published study, scientists from Massachusetts’ Harvard University scientists have now provided important new insights into what drove those changes.
“The story told in most textbooks and museums is that as grasslands gradually took over from forests, horses got bigger, and they reduced their toes to a single digit,” said first author Brianna McHorse, a doctoral student working in the laboratories of Assistant Professor Stephanie Pierce and Professor Andrew Biewener in the university’s Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology.
Selective pressures from new open terrain are hypothesized to drive these changes in digit reduction and body mass – but what are the underlying mechanical consequences of standing on one toe? When in horse evolution did their side toes become non-functional?
To test these questions, the team performed micro-CT scans of 12 fossil horse species then used engineering “beam bending” analysis to calculate how much stress each species’ lower leg bones were experiencing during normal movement and high-speed running.
The stress data were then compared to the fracture stress of bone.
“We assessed bone stress in two ways – the first was to assume a body weight load on the center digit, which is consistent with what living horses experience, but this ignores the potential load-bearing capacity of the side toes of earlier horses,” McHorse said.
“The second thing we did was to scale that load relative to the size of the side toes, so the larger those toes were, the more load they take off the center digit.”
The results, she said, showed that, for many early horse species, those side toes played a critical role, helping to bear some of the animal’s weight to avoid unsafe levels of stress – and potential bone fracture – on their middle digit.
But as horses continued to evolve larger body sizes things began to change.
Pierce continued: “As body mass increased, and side toes shrunk, the middle digit compensated by changing its internal geometry, allowing ever-bigger horse species to eventually stand and move on one toe.
“The bone within the load-bearing digit of later horses was distributed farther away from the center of its cross-section, allowing it to better resist bending.
“The total amount of bone also increased, allowing it to better resist compression as well as bending, which are of critical importance for animals with large body sizes.”
Ultimately, the team said, the study offers the clearest story yet of not only how, but why, horses took a common evolutionary theme like digit reduction and – literally – ran with it.
McHorse said: “Digit reduction is a repeated theme throughout evolution, but going all the way to a single toe … is an uncommon strategy, and in fact horses are the only living monodactyl [single-toed] animal.
“[Despite that,] horses can do some pretty high-performance things – they can run at high speed, jump, and dodge sideways very quickly, and properly trained, they can cover 100 miles in a day. And plenty of people don’t realize they do it all on one toe.”
Brianna K. McHorse et al. Mechanics of evolutionary digit reduction in fossil horses (Equidae), Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences (2017). DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2017.1174
The abstract can be read here.