Culling had bigger effect on wild horses than contraceptive, say researchers


wild-horses-USDA-articleAn American study has cast a spotlight on the effects of culling and a long-acting contraceptive on the behavior of wild horses.

The researchers found that the social behaviors between treated and control female horses, who were given saline, were similar.

However, they noted marked changes in the social behavior of harem stallions, but the evidence suggested this was due to the population culling and not the contraceptive.

The researchers followed wild horses in Theodore Roosevelt National Park, North Dakota, for a year before and a year following non-lethal culling and treatment of some of the mares with a Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), marketed as GonaCon-B.

GonaCon-B has been shown to provide multiple years of infertility in several wild ungulate species, including horses.

The researchers, Jason Ransom, Jenny Powers, Heidi Garbe, Michael Oehler Sr, Terry Nett, and Dan Baker, observed the horses in the study during the breeding season and found only minimal differences in time-budget behaviors between free-ranging female feral horses treated with the contraceptive and those treated with the saline.

What differences they did see were consistent with the metabolic demands of pregnancy and lactation, said the researchers, whose findings have been published in the journal, Applied Animal Behaviour Science.

The researchers said they observed similar social behaviors between treatment groups. This, they said, reflected limited reproductive behavior among the saline-treated females due to high rates of pregnancy and suppressed reproductive behavior among those treated with the contraceptive.

There was no difference between the mean body condition of control females and treated females.

Band fidelity among all females increased 25.7 percent in the year after vaccination and culling, despite the social disturbance associated with the cull.

Herding behavior by stallions decreased 50.7 percent following treatment and culling, while harem-tending behavior increased 195 percent.

The amount of available forage influenced harem-tending, reproductive, and agonistic behavior in the year following culling and treatment.

The horses used in the study were in the southern area of Theodore Roosevelt National Park, and were confined by a high woven wire boundary fence.

All horses in the area had previously been identified and assigned individual identity numbers by park managers. Age and reproductive data for each had been maintained since 1993.

In spring and summer 2009, when all the pre-treatment information was collected, 165 horses occupied the park across 19 bands. All bands contained a single adult stallion and adult females and their offspring, with the exception of one band that had a second stallion. No females lived outside of bands, whereas bachelor males were distributed across the landscape individually or sometimes in small groups.

The horses were gathered into permanent corrals in October 2009, with 78 removed to meet the park agency’s management needs.

The researchers selected 58 adult females, aged 2 to 17, with 29 getting the contraceptive and 28 getting the saline. One mare could not be captured. The females of both treatment groups were dispersed randomly across 16 bands.

Veterinarians blinded to treatment status assessed the general health, pregnancy, and body condition of each animal at the time of capture.

The horses were observed again and data gathered during the following year in three time windows. In all, behavioral information was collected on 93 wild horses – 23 males, 29 pre-treatment females, 27 pre-control females, plus 14 other females during 2009.

There were no differences in behaviors between pre-treatment and pre-control females, the scientists said, but some differences were noted  in the year after inoculation.

“Treated females fed more and moved more than control females, and reciprocated by reducing time in resting and maintenance behaviors. There were no changes in time spent engaging in social behaviors between treated or control females …”

All social behaviors associated with herding, harem-tending, reproduction, and agonism from stallions toward females were observed 57 percent of the time during 2009 and 51 percent of the time during 2010.

The changes in behavior of stallions toward mares were more pronounced.

“Stallions herded all females less and harem-tended more following the changes in population density, demography, and social perturbation that resulted from culling.”

The researchers said forage availability explained some differences between years, while the increased mean age of stallions as well as the decreased band size in 2010, also explained some of the differences.

“None of the models indicated that herding or harem-tending varied due to the treatment status of females, but rather implied that the paradigm shift in competition influenced how band stallions managed their family groups,” they wrote.

There was strong evidence these changes were related to the effects of culling, they said.

The research was funded by the Morris Animal Foundation, the Merck-Merial Veterinary Scholars Program, Theodore Roosevelt National Park, the US Geological Survey Fort Collins Science Center, and the National Park Service Biological Resource Management Division.

Behavior of feral horses in response to culling and GnRH immunocontraception
Jason I. Ransom, Jenny G. Powers, Heidi M. Garbe, Michael W. Oehler Sr., Terry M. Nett, Dan L. Baker.

The full study can be read here

Latest research and information from the horse world.

2 thoughts on “Culling had bigger effect on wild horses than contraceptive, say researchers

  • May 28, 2014 at 5:47 am

    Culling or removal was already known to disrupt the complex society of wild horses. GonaCon can cause permanent sterility too. Now these wild horses do not have a sustainable or genetically viable population.

  • May 28, 2014 at 1:23 pm

    The National Academy of Sciences has already stated that culling only further increases the population of wild horses. Nature does what she can to recover from damages done to population, and the growth of herds is the result of culling. GonaCon, on the other hand, has not been the best method of fertility management in wild horses. PZP has been found to be more effective in mares and has allowed continuous yearly usage without long term infertility. In addition, the mares were distributed randomly after the culling? So that means that they had to develop a totally new family structure as they were torn away from exisiting family bands? A no-brainer there why there were issues! Also, if you are truly doing a scientific study here, proving the behavior of the saline mares vs. the GonaCon mares should have been a separate study than attempting to show the differences between culling and fertility management. The true studies of fertility management occur over more than just a one year period and do not include all of the other factors. So, this clearly is a study severely flawed in its science!


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.