The protection afforded by equine flu vaccinations is not as straightforward as many might think, a special report published this month in the Equine Veterinary Journal suggests.
The journal includes scientific, surveillance, animal health industry and regulatory viewpoints on equine flu that raise questions over the role of vaccination in both limiting the spread of infection and reducing the severity of clinical signs.
The importance of vaccine strain and composition is also discussed.
The British Equine Veterinary Association, meanwhile, is working with key parties to ensure Britain’s horses are protected against the virus in the most effective ways possible.
Equine influenza is a highly contagious viral disease. It is rarely fatal, usually resolving within two to three weeks. It has the potential to be highly disruptive to training and competition schedules.
The FEI’s veterinary director, Graeme Cooke, writing in the journal, points out “protection against influenza depends on good management combined with a good vaccination programme using efficacious vaccine products, with as much of the equine population as possible being vaccinated”.
He continued: “Limiting the effect of outbreaks also depends on having good organised surveillance, or at least taking samples quickly to obtain an early diagnosis. Very important for prevention is the routine application in stables of simple biosecurity measures to prevent the introduction of this and other diseases or at least to reduce their onward transmission.
“Biosecurity should be the first piece of advice that clinicians give to their clients about influenza prevention.”
Vaccination against equine influenza has been mandatory for racing thoroughbreds in Britain since 1981, and major outbreaks have been few and far between since then.
The aim of vaccination is two-fold: to protect the vaccinated individual from becoming ill and to limit the spread of infection by reducing the amount of virus a vaccinated horse will shed if it does become infected, this latter aim being the more important of the two.
Contrary to the perceived effectivness of robust vaccination protocols and absence of infection and disease, the flu virus was found in around 15 percent of nasopharyngeal swabs from both vaccinated and unvaccinated horses in a recent retrospective analysis of laboratory samples in France.
In her state-of-the-art review, “What can mathematical models bring to the control of equine influenza?” Dr J M Daly uses key findings from various modelling studies conducted over the past 10 years to illustrate how this technique can be used to help inform decision-making on prevention and outbreak management.
The review concludes that the majority of outbreaks in vaccinated groups of horses are of limited size and that vaccination reduces the occurrence of epidemics.
The flu virus has an ability to mutate the proteins on its surface, a process known as antigenic drift. These surface proteins are the structures that are recognised by the immune-system and, if they change, a vaccine which has been produced to recognise proteins on older virus strains will be less effective.
However, the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) is using continual analysis of field surveillance data to recommend suitable vaccine strains for inclusion in commercial vaccines in order to help prevent this problem.
None of the vaccines currently on sale in Britain have the most recently recommended strains and only one in the US achieves this.
However, Loïc Legrand’s recent study, Surveillance of equine influenza viruses through the RESPE network in France from November 2005 to October 2010, concludes that vaccination is not the whole answer to the prevention of outbreaks.
He is one of many to have diagnosed flu in horses that were vaccinated as well as those that were not, which is a likely result of the use of mismatched vaccine strains.
Although of little consequence for individuals, mismatched vaccine strains increase the likelihood of large outbreaks and played a role in the escape of the virus from the quarantine station in Australia, which seeded the major epidemic there.
However Dr Horspool, in her article, Equine influenza vaccines in Europe – a view from the animal health industry, makes the important point that this is not the only factor influencing the effectiveness of any specific product and that although some vaccinated horses develop signs and shed virus when exposed to natural challenge with the flu virus, to date there have been no major flu outbreaks in vaccinated populations.
Dr Woodland, from the Veterinary Medicines Directorate, also highlights that an important aim for the licensing authorities is to ensure that vaccines we use in our horses are safe as well as effective.
The process of developing a vaccine strain for inclusion in an authorised vaccine may take several years.
A degree of cross protection between flu strains can be expected and, in contrast to most human influenza vaccines, most equine influenza vaccines contain adjuvants which help boost the immune response and increase the effectiveness.
Professor Celia Marr, Editor of the Equine Veterinary Journal, said: “The EIV disaster in Australia in 2007 was an important wake-up call, yet many racing authorities still have no requirement for vaccination.
“On-going surveillance and a better route to updating vaccine strains are key, while compliance with sport regulators’ requirements is a powerful motivator to ensure vaccination takes place.”
Professor Marr continued: “The British horseracing industry is to be commended as they fund a major surveillance programme via the Horserace Betting Levy Board, but it would be good to see this effort translated into new products.
“It is important that horse owners realise that vaccinating their horses simply to comply with sports regulators’ requirement may not actually achieve the frequency recommended by the manufacturers, particularly at the beginning of the course. The manufacturers recommendations must be followed if the vaccine is to be effective.”
The British Equine Veterinary Association is currently working with representatives of the animal health industry, the Veterinary Medicines Directorate, the FEI, British Horseracing Authority and scientists involved in influenza surveillance.
The working party aims to establish revised guidelines to facilitate and reduce costs of approvals for vaccine strain updates, encourage further education and surveillance on the virus and to review FEI and British racing rules to ensure vaccine use is in accordance with manufacturer’s data sheet.
British Equine Veterinary Association chief executive David Mountford said: “In order to drive the development of new vaccine strains there needs to be collaboration between all stakeholders based on the risk to the equine industry, the understanding of individual disease outcomes (i.e. clinical disease and virus shedding), and the demand from sporting authorities, veterinary practitioners and horse owners.
“These factors, alongside proposed simplification of regulatory requirements, will generate the commercial environment that will effect change.”